Always private
DuckDuckGo never tracks your searches.
Learn More
You can hide this reminder in Search Settings
All regions
Argentina
Australia
Austria
Belgium (fr)
Belgium (nl)
Brazil
Bulgaria
Canada (en)
Canada (fr)
Catalonia
Chile
China
Colombia
Croatia
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hong Kong
Hungary
Iceland
India (en)
Indonesia (en)
Ireland
Israel (en)
Italy
Japan
Korea
Latvia
Lithuania
Malaysia (en)
Mexico
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Pakistan (en)
Peru
Philippines (en)
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Russia
Saudi Arabia
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
South Africa
Spain (ca)
Spain (es)
Sweden
Switzerland (de)
Switzerland (fr)
Taiwan
Thailand (en)
Turkey
Ukraine
United Kingdom
US (English)
US (Spanish)
Vietnam (en)
Safe search: moderate
Strict
Moderate
Off
Any time
Any time
Past day
Past week
Past month
Past year
  1. worksinprogress.co

    Outdated forms of peer review create bottlenecks that slow science. But in a world where research can now circulate rapidly on the Internet, we need to develop new ways to do science in public. ... Real peer review has never been tried. 21st July 2022. 23 Mins . ... There's perhaps no better example of this than the way research has been ...
  2. news.ycombinator.com

    - directing resources specifically to improving peer review. The bigger problem is that the author doesn't seem to actually zero in on the problem peer review is supposed to solve today. The author notes that peer review really got going in the 1970s as a way to filter content flowing to overwhelmed editors.
  3. a-ortmann.medium.com

    Jan 26, 2023Well, maybe not. This kind of ex-post peer review has in fact been tried before. By Nature. In 2006. Didn't last long though. Despite an average of 5,600 page views a week, "this reader interest did not convert into significant numbers of comments," 92 comments were made over four months. Then that experiment was over. Finito. Kaputt.
  4. Real peer review has never been tried ... Paper: Opt-in double blind peer review is not fully effective upvote r/ReverseEngineering. r/ReverseEngineering. A moderated community dedicated to all things reverse engineering. Members Online ...
  5. experimental-history.com

    Peer review was a huge, expensive intervention. By one estimate, scientists collectively spend 15,000 years reviewing papers every year. It can take months or years for a paper to wind its way through the review system, which is a big chunk of time when people are trying to do things like cure cancer and stop climate change. And universities fork over millions for access to peer-reviewed ...
  6. worksinprogress.co

    Jul 7, 2023It has £800m and the freedom to make big bold bets on the scientific trajectories it thinks will benefit Britain - and change the future. ... Real peer review has never been tried. Words by Saloni Dattani. Outdated forms of peer review create bottlenecks that slow science. But in a world where research can now circulate rapidly on the ...
  7. joannenova.com.au

    Peer Review has been a sixty year experiment with no control group. ... fraud is almost never discovered, and peer review has effectively crushed groundbreaking new discoveries. ... ideological science have been tried, but we're far worse than peer review. 2 19 # Ross. May 17, 2023 at 9:12 am ...
  8. Nov 5, 2018With 2.5 million peer-reviewed papers published annually worldwide — and more that are reviewed but never published — it can be hard to find enough people to review all the work.

    Can’t find what you’re looking for?

    Help us improve DuckDuckGo searches with your feedback

Custom date rangeX